Abstract Background Few studies have assessed elderly patients with Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). Objectives To evaluate the progression of TAK in different age groups and its possible effects on drug treatment and disease activity. Methods This cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study included 66 TAK patients. Patients were interviewed and data of the 12 preceding months were collected from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into four quartiles according to current age and compared for clinical and laboratory data, treatment, comorbidities, disease status, and functional status. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results The groups were Q1(22-36 years, n=16), Q2(37-42 years, n=18), Q3(43-49 years, n=17), and Q4(51-66 years, n=15). The frequency of patients with disease activity, fatigue, comorbidities and vascular impairments, and the TAK disease extent index were also comparable between the groups. With age, disease duration was longer (p=0.001), fewer patients used prednisone (Q1:43.8%, Q2:33.3%, Q3:11.8%, and Q4:6.7%; p=0.049) and immunosuppressive drugs [Q1:100.0%, Q2:66.7%, Q3:58.8%, and Q4:46.7%; Q1 versus Q3 (p=0.043), and Q1 versus Q4 (p=0.005) in post-hoc analyses], and patients had greater functional status impairment (Q2 versus Q3, p=0.003). In addition, the levels of disease damage, new TAK symptoms, and complications in the preceding 12 months were not different between the groups. Conclusions Older patients with TAK require minimal drug treatment, and have greater impairment of functional status, which may be attributed to aging-related factors.

Resumo Fundamentos Poucos estudos avaliaram pacientes idosos com Arterite de Takayasu (AT). Objetivo Avaliar o progresso de AT em diferentes grupos etários em seus possíveis efeitos sobre o tratamento medicamentoso e atividade da doença. Métodos este estudo transversal, retrospectivo, do tipo coorte incluiu 66 pacientes com AT. Os pacientes foram entrevistados, e dados dos 12 meses anteriores foram coletados dos prontuários médicos eletrônicos. Os pacientes foram divididos em quatro quartis de acordo com idade atual, e comparados quanto aos dados clínicos e laboratoriais, tratamento, comorbidades, status da doença, e status funcional. Um p<0,05 foi estabelecido como estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Os grupos foram definidos como Q1(22-36 anos, n=16), Q2(37-42 anos, n=18), Q3(43-49 anos, n=17), e Q4(51-66 anos, n=15). A frequência de pacientes com atividade da doença, fadiga, comorbidades e comprometimentos vasculares, e o índice de extensão da doença (DEI. Tak) foram comparáveis entre os grupos. Pacientes com idade mais avançada apresentaram maior duração da doença (p=0,001) e maior comprometimento do status funcional (Q2 versus Q3, p=0,003); menos pacientes usaram prednisona (Q1:43,8%; Q2:33,3%; Q3:11,8%; e Q4:6,7%; p=0,049) e agentes imunossupressores [Q1:100,0%; Q2:66,7%; Q3:58,8% e Q4:46,7%; Q1 versus Q3 (p=0,043) e Q1 versus Q4 (p=0,005) nas análises post-hoc]. Além disso, os níveis de danos da doença, sintomas de uma nova ocorrência de AT, e complicações nos 12 meses precedentes não foram diferentes entre os grupos. Conclusão Pacientes com AT e idade mais avançada requerem mínima intervenção medicamentosa e apresentam maior comprometimento no status funcional, o que pode ser atribuído a fatores relacionados ao envelhecimento.

Abstract Background: The Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010) was developed in 2010 as an assessment tool for disease activity in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA). It has since been widely used in different studies and in clinical practice for the management of patients with TA. The present study aims to translate the ITAS2010 into Brazilian Portuguese language and to validate it for use in clinical practice in Brazil. Methods: For this cross-sectional study, the ITAS2010 was translated in accordance with the guidelines described by Beaton et al. and then applied with 27 patients with TA on three assessments by two rheumatologists working independently. To measure interrater agreement, the assessments were performed on the same day within approximately 1 hour. One of the rheumatologists performed a second evaluation of patients with TA within 7 to 14 days to measure intrarater agreement. Results: The correlation coefficient for the ITAS2010 score between the two raters was high (r =0.916; p < 0.0001), as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [0.918 with a 95% confidence interval (95CI): 0.828-0.962]. The correlation coefficient and the ICC for intrarater agreement were moderate for ITAS2010 (r =0.633; p < 0.0001 and ICC = 0.594; 95CI: 0.292-0.790). The ITAS2010 at baseline was compared with the physician's global assessment (PGA) and with Kerr's criteria for detecting disease activity in TA. Higher ITAS2010 scores were observed in patients with active and grumbling/persistent disease than in those presenting inactive disease according to the PGA [1.5 (0.0-3.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0-0.0); p = 0.0025]. Patients with active disease according to the Kerr's criteria had also higher ITAS2010 scores than those considered in remission [3.0 (3.0-7.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0-0.0); p = 0.0068]. Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the ITAS2010 is a valid and reproducible tool for the assessment of disease activity in TA and it is an additional tool for the routine evaluation of Brazilian patients with TA.